I think it would help the group if more and more experts come forward to
share different jobs. For last so many years my self and Garg ji have been
doing our best to resurface the pending identifications and how tiring this
job is. Every body knows we have been giving all previous feedbacks and our
comments also. Seeing how difficult job it is Dinesh ji, who has been doing
all important job for the website, (which not every one can appreciate). has
given a lending of resurfacing. Rather than appreciating such efforts I find
one member has chosen to find faults with it. It would have been more
appropriate if he had found and supplemented the resurfacing efforts. I have
been requesting him repeatedly to take up some jobs on the group. He does
not want to do any job for the group, but is ready to find faults with every
body else. His consistent lines in the middle of the thread have been "I
think..............................." and there is not s single evidence to
support his conclusion. The other day he wrote on the group "there may be
other experts on the group who can identify your photographs
but............................". Such type of behavior only spoils the
atmosphere of the group. few days back when Dinesh ji shared some valuable
identified plants on the group, he consistently asked him to supply details
about the plants which were already identified and with useful information
of all regional names. I had to tell him that person sharing his already
identified plants is only doing service to the group, and every thing
supplied by him is a bonus for us. If we have any doubts we should do our
home work and if there are any doubts he should share with evidence.
I am sorry to share this in the forum, but I have tried in vain that he
does not spoil the harmony of the group, but it seems his intrusions are
increasing and are not for the good of the group. I request him again that
is a talented person and should use this for welfare of the group and not
spoil its harmony through his frequent non too desirable utterances.
--
Dr. Gurcharan Singh
Retired Associate Professor
SGTB Khalsa College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
Res: 932 Anand Kunj, Vikas Puri, New Delhi-110018.
Phone: 011-25518297 Mob: 9810359089
http://people.du.ac.in/~singhg45/
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Samir Mehta <[email protected]> wrote:
> I did just that yesterday & I am happy that the same is being
> suggested to the group for wider implementation.
>
> Please see:
>
> https://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix/browse_thread/thread/cff8bf25002f8c8d/a5847174c6cfc51a?hl=en&lnk=gst&q=boerhavia+diffusa#
> ]
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Samir Mehta
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 23, 1:31 pm, H S <[email protected]> wrote:
> > One request to the group:
> >
> > no doubt its very clear that the plant photo is not 100 percent sure
> about
> > the identity if posted again as resurfing for identification. just one
> > request to those who are posting again for resurfing, if he or she can
> give
> > or add little comments on the earlier post by the member for the
> identity..
> > than it would become easy to seperate them from another species.. or it
> can
> > be discuss by the moderator member of the group and than put for
> resurfing
> > with some extra details..
> >
> > one question.. is it necessary to identify every not clear photos (i mean
> > some times photos are not so clear to identify the species level and if
> > someone is doing so, i think it can only be a guess and not a 100 percent
> > proper identification), than why to stretch on such things and waste
> time...
> > by putting again and again it for resurfing...
> >
> > regards
> >
> > --
> > - H.S.
> >
> > A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart
> of
> > stone
>
