|
James, How wonderful to get back to theological reflection
after so much discussion about resolution 84.
Your question is a very good one and I will do my best to
explain it from my panentheistic understanding of God. Panentheism simply means
that everything is in God and God is in everything. This tends to move us away
from understanding God as a "supernatural being" to being the "essence of all
being" or to quote Paul Til, "The ground of all being." Everything exists in God
and beyond God nothing exists.
At a workshop we had earlier in the year with Michael Morwood
and Sarah Mitchell, (both professed panentheists) Michael began by asking the
question "where is God in the universe?" After detailing the enormity of the
universe and then getting an agreed response that God was everywhere, he then
went on to ask, "well where is God conscious of being God?"
He then went on to argue that assuming that God is everywhere,
the only place we can say that God has come to consciousness that we know of is
in the development of life on this planet and that the highest known
level of that consciousness was to be found in the evolution of the
human species.
I have found this a fascinating playground for my mind to play
in ever since the workshop. I'm not sure as I am yet able to comprehend or
espouse the ramifications of such a belief or even if I can give an unqualified
'yes' to the suggestion, but I have to say it makes sense and I certainly can't
name any other place where I can say that God is conscious of being
God.
Michael referred to the work of scientist Paul Davis and his
use of quantum physics to demonstrate that 'mind' seems to have some form
of presence in all matter. He wants to argue, however, that it is only when mind
has a highly complex nervous system such as the human brain that it can it can
achieve such levels of consciousness that it can become conscious of
itself.
What a frightening thought. Humans might be the highest
_expression_ of God on this planet.
Morwood goes on to suggest that throughout the evolutionary
process there have been Einstein's who seem to have been able to use the grey
matter better than others around them, but there have also been people who seem
to have been able to touch into a deeper level of being and reveal a sense of
transcendence, or what we might call God. He cites Jesus as one of these people.
As Christians, we might want to claim that for us, Jesus becomes the ultimate
revelation of the divine nature within us, but of course we have no way of
proving this and we therefore have no right to expect that following of
other paths may not be at least equally valid.
So in all of this, we have to say that God works with what God
has to work with and that means for all intents and purposes within what we
might call the laws of physics or nature. God, in this sense, may be understood
as gently nudging the evolution of being from within the process. Occasionally
certain things happen which seem to us to be outside the natural laws as we
understand them and we call these occurrences miracles. But of course as
our knowledge of the universe increases and the phenomena behind many of these
events is explained, such happenings become much rarer.
This of course has been a relatively simple answer to a very
deep question. But it is this sort of understanding of God that can make
sense in the world as we know it today. It is also why I believe that the
church can't continue to simply quote doctrines and creeds that were formulated
from an era that held a vastly different cosmology to that which we hold today.
It is also why I believe that the old argument that the church has been in
decline before so the current decline is simply part of a cycle will have to be
abandoned. The simpler fact is that traditional church theology is being
challenged from knowledge and reason in ways that has never happened in the
past. A retreat into orthodoxy will only supply comfort to a limited number of
people for a limited time.
I hope people will feel free to discuss any point or all of
this response.
Grace & Peace.
Allan
|
- Easy reading - sound theology Tom Stuart
- RE: Easy reading - sound theology Andrew Swenson
- Re: Easy reading - sound theology Sue Bolton
- RE: Easy reading - sound theology Pam Tupe
- RE: Easy reading - sound theology Cheryl Lawrie
- Re: Easy reading - sound theology aleggett
- Re: Easy reading - sound theology Gordon Ramsay
- How does God act in the world today? James Tonson
- RE: How does God act in the world toda... Geoff Hurst
- Re: How does God act in the world toda... aleggett
- Re: How does God act in the world... Sue Bolton
- Re: How does God act in the w... aleggett
- RE: How does God act in t... Tom Stuart
- Re: How does God act in t... Sue Bolton
- Re: How does God act in t... James Tonson
- RE: How does God act in t... darren wright
- Easy reading - sound theology Susan & Wesley
- Re: Easy reading - sound theology Bruce Mullan
- Re: Easy reading - sound theology Trevor Mattiske
- RE: Easy reading - sound theology darren wright
