Not really the shit-list, but they do tend to favor windows quite a bit.
Very main stream. Personally, I hate the false-technical writing they do.
As in, they sound like they know what they are talking about, but have no
clue. That's not all the articles by any means, but I seem to only
remember them. That and you KNOW the benchmarks are jaded a lot of the
times. I have experience with some of the products saying they are the
slowest, when they have been, in my opinion, the fastest. But then, it's
all kind of subjective. It's only a matter of time before ZD comes up
with their swift new idea of a Linux magazine and that becomes mainstream.
Bleh, then I'll have to go get my hands on a sparc or something.
On Fri, 18 Dec 1998, Douglas Wagner wrote:
> Um, have I missed something here? When did PC-Mag go on the shit list to computer
>users?
>
> Douglas Wagner
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Scott Shriver [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 1998 2:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Li ion battery life inspiron 3200
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 1998, Ned Bedinger wrote:
>
> Also, note that PC
> magazine (no hate mail please) does a reasonable job of giving realistic
> run times.
>
>
>
>
> ---
> http://nts.ml.org
> FAQ: http://www.ps.uci.edu/~tomba/inspiron/
> http://nts.ml.org/inspiron/
> List Archives: http://nts.ml.org/inspiron/maillist.html
> To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> List administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
---
http://nts.ml.org
FAQ: http://www.ps.uci.edu/~tomba/inspiron/
http://nts.ml.org/inspiron/
List Archives: http://nts.ml.org/inspiron/maillist.html
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
