I would think that if they are on an IDE card, built in or otherwise, 
that it would work... I'll be interested in the results.  Have you tried 
with a different OE (Linux, Windows, etc)?  I'm seeing the same thing 
but the CD/DVD drive is external USB.  Both Windows and Fedora 9 (which 
uses GRUB) loaded perfectly off my external USB drive... OpenSolaris not 
so much as I get the grub prompt in the same manner as Scott.  I assume 
from what you're stating this would be a limitation of OpenSolaris?

Tony Reeves wrote:
> 2008/12/28 Scott Castaline <hscast at charter.net>:
>   
>> Someone at another list had mentioned something about the fact that some 
>> DVD/CD burners may have some odd low-level blocking to sector  that osol 
>> can't read. The problem with that theory is that at the point of failure, I 
>> think it is still under control of the code in GRUB which is also used in as 
>> a Linux boot loader. Unless if SUN and the osol community is massaging the 
>> code for GRUB, it shouldn't matter. But on the other hand since I can boot 
>> the CD or image file in a Virtualbox VM, there Virtualbox translates the 
>> physical CD/DVD-ROM into a very generic one along with a customized PCI Bus 
>> that appears very generic to the software. My physical DVD-ROM & DVD-RAM are 
>> both on the Primary Channel on a 2-channel PCI/IDE option card, while my 2 
>> PATA IDE HDDs are on the onboard IDE single channel bus.
>>
>> I'm thinking of temporarily changing that by splitting the opticals with the 
>> HDDs. Mixing an HDD with an optical on each separate IDE bus. Or I could 
>> just take the drive that I want to use for osol along with the DVD-ROM on 
>> the onboard and remove the other drives. If it installs than I'll see what 
>> happens when I put it all back to the original config. I'll post the results 
>> when and if I do it.
>>     
>
> I think you are on the right track.  There is limited CDROM support
> beyond straight ide in the Solaris boot loader.  Putting the cdrom on
> as the first secondary ide device would most likely work.
>   


Reply via email to