On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:36 PM, James Carlson<james.d.carlson at sun.com> wrote: > > Thus, I'll reiterate my +1 for this project. I think it's a great > experiment, and deserves some real estate on the opensolaris.org web > site in order to do its work. That's all we're really discussing here > -- not whether this project will ever integrate anywhere, not whether > we're giving it Sun's imprimatur -- but just whether this community > should allow it to exist as an OpenSolaris Project, and I think it > should.
As do I. A definite +1. If people want to do stuff, we should be encouraging them all the way. This is opensolaris.org, supposedly an open source community. Within the context of open source, more involvement is better. Diversity is good, multiple approaches to the same problem are good, overlaps aren't a problem, people don't need to ask permission to build upon other work, there doesn't have to be rigid adherence to a central plan, exploration and energy are to be applauded. -- -Peter Tribble http://www.petertribble.co.uk/ - http://ptribble.blogspot.com/
