The road blocks are that we are talking in acronyms (CG) and Sun gargon. By your own words "Admittedly, the path that projects should take is poorly defined for some CGs." So lets just help him. From everything I've seen the rest of world (not US) are the ones who don't like Microsoft and are looking for alternatives. Lets not give a reason to not like Sun.
Bruce Rothermal Shawn Walker wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 9:10 AM, Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> wrote: > >> I've been following this discussion for some time now and it would seem >> that it is very counter productive to the whole Open Community concept. >> We at Sun can't invite people from all over the world to contribute to >> Solaris and then put up road blocks because they don't know the Internal >> Sun procedures and protocols. Getting into shouting matches over >> language when its been made clear that English is not the contributors >> first language should not even be considered. It is our job at Sun to >> help them. >> > > I don't see any road blocks here. A proper proposal, CG discussion, > etc. is all a necessary part of the process. > > Thus far, the Conary evaluation and/or evaluation has chosen a > seemingly arbitrary path. > > Admittedly, the path that projects should take is poorly defined for some CGs. > > In this case, I believe the primary issue is that the related project > has not effectively sought guidance from their sponsoring CGs. > > Cheers, >
