Hopefully we will learn, adapt, get along with everybody :*) and the stock price will shoot through the roof.
Thanks all Bruce Mike Gerdts wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 2:32 PM, Bruce Rothermal <Bruce.Rothermal at sun.com> wrote: > >> Thank you so very much for this info. Maybe Martin will come back. >> Hopefully I will be the wiser on this because my group will be going >> through this same process very soon and it is not very friendly from >> what I saw in the emails over the last couple of days. On either side. >> > > The process can be quite civil and orderly. With PSARC/2007/688[1] I > found the process to be good in helping me to cover the bases and to > document what is being done better. I think my experience with man(1) > improvements was less painful because there wasn't any real > controversy. The Conary project started with controversy (search the > archives) and I think that any unfriendliness is likely a follow-on > from this. Conary's progress within OpenSolaris will be an > interesting test of how things are handled when a (non-Sun) community > project doesn't fall in line with a Sun-driven (community) project to > address highly overlapping subject matter. > > 1. http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2007/688/ > > >
