On 3/6/2014 8:28 AM, joel jaeggli wrote:
Greetings int-area and hiaps-mailing-list folks, I realize that this is midweek at the IETF, however this question is not far from several discussions I've had this week. I have been asked to consider AD sponsoring http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-boucadair-intarea-host-identifier-scenarios-04 In the process of considering doing so I'd like to get some input with respect to: A. The appetite for pursuing some or any of this work in existing working groups, and in particular within the INT area.
Given that draft-ietf-intarea-nat-reveal-analysis is in INT, and this document expands on that, I think this belongs in INT.
B. A consensus basis for moving beyond RFC 6269 into active work in this area.
See my response to (A). INT is already active in that area.
C. How we address concerns raised by the IETF community expressed through draft-farrell-perpass-attack when evaluating scenarios and beginning to address requirements and solution-space.
That should definitely be addressed in this doc. Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
