On 3/10/2014 10:16 AM, Scott Brim wrote:
Joe, http://
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3>tools.ietf.org
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3>/
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3>html
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3>/rfc6967#section-3
<http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6967#section-3> says that a host-id will
be generated anew any time the endpoint IP address changes, perhaps more
often.
I believe you're referring to:
"... a distinct HOST_ID may be used by the address-
sharing function when the host reboots or gets a new internal IP
address."
That's not a requirement; it's an example. This doc is a survey; no one
rule applies everywhere.
Is that wrong? It's hard to do a privacy audit if the behavior isn't
agreed on.
Again, it's a survey. An audit would apply to a given approach.
Joe
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
