Hi Suresh, On 4/9/15 1:13 AM, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > Hi Brian, > > On 04/08/2015 06:18 PM, Brian Haberman wrote: >> >> If anything were to go in this document, I could see an additional >> description in the Security Considerations section that describes the >> vulnerability you are concerned about. >> >> WG? > > This was discussed even before the document was adopted. The document > was originally shooting for BCP and due to these concerns, all > prescriptive text was removed and it became solely a description of > existing (and widely deployed) implementations. I had summarized this in > the WG summary of the Shepherd writeup. I am not sure what to add to the > Security considerations of this draft, but it is worth exploring.
Given that Fred raised the issue, I would ask that he propose text for the Security Considerations section that the WG to consider. Regards, Brian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
