Hi Brian, I don't have plans of submitting a text proposal, but I have to say that this document concerns me on many levels. It essentially says that there are deployed implementations that do not honor the robustness principle and then seeks to bless them by noting the behavior in the RFC series.
The presence of fragmentation should be an indication to network operators that something is out of tune and needs to be tuned. It should not be an excuse to take the tunnel down unconditionally. Thanks - Fred [email protected] > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:03 AM > To: Suresh Krishnan; Templin, Fred L; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Int-area] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu > > > > On 4/9/15 6:36 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: > > > > Given that Fred raised the issue, I would ask that he propose text for > > the Security Considerations section that the WG to consider. > > Will there be a text proposal for this or can the authors spin a new > document based on the existing commentary? > > Regards, > Brian > _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
