Given the below response, a new version should be generated based on my feedback and we can continue with the publication process.
Regards, Brian On 4/9/15 2:12 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote: > Hi Brian, > > I don't have plans of submitting a text proposal, but I have to say that this > document concerns me on many levels. It essentially says that there are > deployed implementations that do not honor the robustness principle > and then seeks to bless them by noting the behavior in the RFC series. > > The presence of fragmentation should be an indication to network > operators that something is out of tune and needs to be tuned. It > should not be an excuse to take the tunnel down unconditionally. > > Thanks - Fred > [email protected] > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 11:03 AM >> To: Suresh Krishnan; Templin, Fred L; [email protected]; >> [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Int-area] AD Evaluation: draft-ietf-intarea-gre-mtu >> >> >> >> On 4/9/15 6:36 AM, Brian Haberman wrote: >>> >>> Given that Fred raised the issue, I would ask that he propose text for >>> the Security Considerations section that the WG to consider. >> >> Will there be a text proposal for this or can the authors spin a new >> document based on the existing commentary? >> >> Regards, >> Brian >>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
