On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 11:26:47PM +0200, Ole Troan wrote: > > > > On 26 Aug 2018, at 23:12, Joe Touch <to...@strayalpha.com> wrote: > > > > As I???ve mentioned, there are rules under which a NAT is a valid Internet > > device, but it is simply not just a router. > > If there really was, can you point to where those rules are? Describing the > behavior of the host stack and applications?
"A NAT is a transport layer circuit proxy whose network stack owns outside adresses on the inside and inside addresses on the outside." Something like that. Very likely not explicitly defined that way given how BEHAVE just developed pragmatically whats necessary to make things work and AFAIK wa prudent enough not to have the architectural argument . > Ole _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
