Joe,
>>>
>>> On 26 Aug 2018, at 23:12, Joe Touch <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> As I’ve mentioned, there are rules under which a NAT is a valid Internet
>>> device, but it is simply not just a router.
>>
>> If there really was, can you point to where those rules are? Describing the
>> behavior of the host stack and applications?
>
> The principles are described and explained here:
>
> Touch, J: Middlebox Models Compatible with the Internet. USC/ISI
> (ISI-TR-711), 2016. (
>
I don’t want to dismiss this completely, but it hand waves over how
applications are supposed to work in this new Internet architecture.
You can define your way out of breaking end-to-end, but that doesn’t mean you
can ignore all the issues of NAT traversal.
Cheers
Ole
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
