Ron Bonica wrote: > > Joe Touch wrote: >> Ron Bonica wrote: >> >>> Joe Touch wrote: >>> >>>> Ron Bonica wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> The problem is that anything short of having this be standards-track >>>>>> means that future standards-track docs _need_ not consider this work at >>>>>> all. If that's not the goal, than this needs to go a different track. >>>>>> >>>>> Jari, >>>>> >>>>> Is there some requirement for PS that this document does not meet? >>>>> >>>>> Ron >>>> IMO, PS would require a much more complete description of the specific >>>> changes to RFCs 792 and 1122. >>> Could you describe those changes? Maybe we can make them. >> >> It's hard to say in each specific case; a good example of what *I* >> expect (at least) of a mod to a spec is in >> draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-simple-auth-00.txt (which mods only RFCs 793 and 2385). >> >> Joe >> > > Joe, > > I am afraid that your response doesn't help me very much. Maybe I am > just being obtuse, but by looking at draft-touch-tcpm-simple-auth, I am > not able to identify a requirement for publication as PS that > draft-bonica-internet-icmp does not meet.
Sorry, but my involvement in providing text for this document exceeds what I consider the 'author' bound. Since there isn't room for that, a corollary description is the best I can do. > Maybe somebody else can formulate a response to my initial question? Jari? > > Ron
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
