Ron Bonica wrote: > > Joe Touch wrote: >> Ron Bonica wrote: >> >>>> The problem is that anything short of having this be standards-track >>>> means that future standards-track docs _need_ not consider this work at >>>> all. If that's not the goal, than this needs to go a different track. >>>> >>> Jari, >>> >>> Is there some requirement for PS that this document does not meet? >>> >>> Ron >> >> IMO, PS would require a much more complete description of the specific >> changes to RFCs 792 and 1122. > > Could you describe those changes? Maybe we can make them.
It's hard to say in each specific case; a good example of what *I* expect (at least) of a mod to a spec is in draft-touch-tcpm-tcp-simple-auth-00.txt (which mods only RFCs 793 and 2385). Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
