On Mon, 04 Apr 2011 08:09:42 -0700, Keith Packard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 07:26:45 +0100, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Rather than proceed on to the next test, return the result from > > detecting a connection but to a digital panel and include some debug > > output as to why. > > I'm worried that this will falsely reject some monitors with broken EDID > information.
This doesn't change the nature of the test, just adds a debug message so that we explain why it was rejected. Vital information should anyone report a bug with a connected VGA monitor. This is another case where we are damned if we do and damned if we don't. Some hardware requires us to differentiate between VGA/DVI connections on the same i2c wire and the rejection here was originally added to enable us to function correctly on such a machine. As far as broken EDIDs go, there are plenty of bugs to go around. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
