On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 08:16:04PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:59:23 -0700, Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> > > From the school of "If ain't broke, don't fix it" there needs to be a real > explanation of why this change is required here. > > PIPE_CONTROL and its workarounds is a very bitter pill to swallow if > MI_FLUSH continues to function.
Lazy tlb flush, gfdt flush, seperate depth cache flush. In short, I want this ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: [email protected] Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
