On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:23:02 +0200, Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 08:16:04PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:59:23 -0700, Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > From: Jesse Barnes <[email protected]> > > > > From the school of "If ain't broke, don't fix it" there needs to be a real > > explanation of why this change is required here. > > > > PIPE_CONTROL and its workarounds is a very bitter pill to swallow if > > MI_FLUSH continues to function. > > Lazy tlb flush, gfdt flush, seperate depth cache flush. In short, I want > this ;-)
I feel jaded, I could have swore you just said "bug, bugs, bugs." ;-) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
