On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 20:16:04 +0100, Chris Wilson <[email protected]> wrote:
> PIPE_CONTROL and its workarounds is a very bitter pill to swallow if > MI_FLUSH continues to function. If you look at the simulator source code, you'll see that it implements MI_FLUSH as a specific kind of PIPE_CONTROL. And that MI_FLUSH isn't being validated anymore. If this is all true, then this isn't a huge change, other than exposing which PIPE_CONTROL workarounds we're supposed to be using in the MI_FLUSH paths... -- [email protected]
pgpyBsy7X5Y4O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
