By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c index a501d850c6d5..cf93bb2a2ac3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -1545,7 +1545,11 @@ static void _vlv_enable_pll(struct intel_crtc *crtc, POSTING_READ(DPLL(pipe)); udelay(150); - if (wait_for(((I915_READ(DPLL(pipe)) & DPLL_LOCK_VLV) == DPLL_LOCK_VLV), 1)) + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, + DPLL(pipe), + DPLL_LOCK_VLV, + DPLL_LOCK_VLV, + 1)) DRM_ERROR("DPLL %d failed to lock\n", pipe); } -- 2.8.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
