By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 8 +++++---
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index d299a3d95cfa..bce44ecc9409 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -531,9 +531,11 @@ static void hsw_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
                           I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL) & ~EDP_PSR_ENABLE);
 
                /* Wait till PSR is idle */
-               if (_wait_for((I915_READ(EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL) &
-                              EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK) == 0,
-                              2 * USEC_PER_SEC, 10 * USEC_PER_MSEC))
+               if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+                                           EDP_PSR_STATUS_CTL,
+                                           EDP_PSR_STATUS_STATE_MASK,
+                                           0,
+                                           2000))
                        DRM_ERROR("Timed out waiting for PSR Idle State\n");
 
                dev_priv->psr.active = false;
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to