By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):
text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index 29a09bf6bd18..d299a3d95cfa 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -501,8 +501,11 @@ static void vlv_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) if (dev_priv->psr.active) { /* Put VLV PSR back to PSR_state 0 that is PSR Disabled. */ - if (wait_for((I915_READ(VLV_PSRSTAT(intel_crtc->pipe)) & - VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS) == 0, 1)) + if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv, + VLV_PSRSTAT(intel_crtc->pipe), + VLV_EDP_PSR_IN_TRANS, + 0, + 1)) WARN(1, "PSR transition took longer than expected\n"); val = I915_READ(VLV_PSRCTL(intel_crtc->pipe)); -- 2.8.1 _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
