By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can
efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we
avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches):

   text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
1078551    4557     416 1083524  108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko
1070775    4557     416 1075748  106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
index 56744471cbac..97893457ddb8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sideband.c
@@ -64,7 +64,9 @@ static int vlv_sideband_rw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, 
u32 devfn,
                I915_WRITE(VLV_IOSF_DATA, *val);
        I915_WRITE(VLV_IOSF_DOORBELL_REQ, cmd);
 
-       if (wait_for((I915_READ(VLV_IOSF_DOORBELL_REQ) & IOSF_SB_BUSY) == 0, 
5)) {
+       if (intel_wait_for_register(dev_priv,
+                                   VLV_IOSF_DOORBELL_REQ, IOSF_SB_BUSY, 0,
+                                   5)) {
                DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("IOSF sideband finish wait (%s) timed out\n",
                                 is_read ? "read" : "write");
                return -ETIMEDOUT;
-- 
2.8.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to