cool....^^ have u tested it here? it's the first build dx11 game engine by the way, but not commercially produced...
http://unigine.com/download/ On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Sheerz <[email protected]> wrote: > Umm My GeForce 8400 Supports DX11 just fine. It was only $40... > > On Jan 22, 2:25 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > it depends on what are u doing.... > > i prefer intel CPUs for media purposes and multimedia performance > (decoding, > > encoding, BD playback etc..), and AMD CPUs for pure gaming machines ( a > > combo with ATI graphics is highly recommencded) ...AMD is a great company > > btw....even the ATI series, the ATI HD 4 series can process DX10.1 while > > NVIDIA is lagging behind...even the new ATI HD 5 series now fully support > > DX11, while NVIDIA, well juz not yet... > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Namige <[email protected]> wrote: > > > AMD used to be way better than intel but now they're lagging behind so > > > I'd have the i7 anyday > > > > > On Jan 22, 1:32 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > yeah, if i was given a choice...i would have a Phenom X4 Black > Edition > > > > rather than a i7...lol > > > > btw, ive heard of the case and i was also pised..no wonder that kinda > > > most > > > > games runs slower on AMD..... > > > > if the case is won by AMD, welcome to the new cheaper gaming century > ^^ > > > > > > and AMD Phenom x4 BE + ATI HD 4870 / 5870 FTW!! lol..as if i can > afford > > > that > > > > machine... > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:48 AM, Espionage724 < > [email protected] > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm, I do happen to have a intel and amd cpu (celeron vs sempron) > and > > > > > I admit I do like my sempron better (actual x64 support :p) > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:29 PM, hussam aulaian < > [email protected]> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > hahaha AMD IS lagging!!!!!!!!!!!! WTF man who u r kidding ,, > > > > > > man AMD just won a case against intel > > > > > > intel was abusing all the programs that been compiled by its own > > > compiler > > > > > > so if that code runs under non-intel chipset the Perf decreases > and > > > AMD > > > > > was > > > > > > so pissed > > > > > > so they filed the case and they hav won , very powerfull > > > > > > and man dont talk abt performance > > > > > > cuz i hav tested over 100 CPUs > > > > > > intel celeron , ATOM , pentium 4 , pentuim m , pentium D " all > > > > > > fail!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! " in gaming > > > > > > unless u hav a good GPU > > > > > > AMD sempron > celeron "even cheaper " > > > > > > AMD athlon 64 > Pentium 4 " even cheaper" and i hav overclocked > an > > > athlon > > > > > 64 > > > > > > as i said > > > > > > and man AMD athlon 64 1.8mh it ran just cause with " SIS " GPU , > and > > > > > intel > > > > > > P4 wiht intel GPU > > > > > > failed even to open the menu of the game!!!!!!!!!!! > > > > > > man phenom 2 has to win but this shit of intel compiler screwed > it > > > over , > > > > > > dont tell me wht is the best even by temp AMD comes first , > always > > > the > > > > > temp > > > > > > is 65 , 70 , 75 c , with normal cooler > > > > > > AMD temp always , 38 , 43 , 50 MAX!!!!! > > > > > > so DONT SAY INTEL IS ******* better > > > > > > intel was good when AMD failed in 32 bit division > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > > > > -- > > > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > -- > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
