In the x86 versions of the Sigma 3 and 965 package from intel, the
only difference is

- Async option
- Memory
- Named drivers

theres a few other minor changes, I'll find em later


On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well i only quickly analyzed the INF but now I guess ill do a more
> indeph look :p
>
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:33 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote:
>> As I said earlier , info on that won't be released to public just
>> yet ;) . But, I'm kinda ashamed that you can't see what's changed by
>> yourself.....
>>
>> On Apr 23, 12:06 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> But wait? Nobody still never answered what was changed in the INF lol.
>>> because in theroy, 965 users could use Alpha drivers and still get the
>>> same performance as sigma 3.
>>>
>>> I'mma go find out for myself what Sigma 2 was based on here...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> > @Gerard : These are 965 Drivers.... I told people that they might
>>> > wanna try, but It's not a 100% sure that you're gonna be able to
>>> > install it under the 950 ( or for the matter get all the tweaks )
>>>
>>> > @DanielPk: Play with the 3DSettings in the intel control Panel. I
>>> > found that using the "Driver memory footprint" in low usually gives
>>> > you a good boost for opengl . Might wanna try putting Asynchronous on
>>> > ( V-Sync ) wich should help quite a bit too.
>>>
>>> > On Apr 23, 7:25 am, DanielPK <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> @Irony:
>>>
>>> >> bro, i manage the site, and the links are UPDATED "i haven't included
>>> >> Sigma 3.0 YET as we still need more testings" but..am not sure at
>>> >> all..that is pretty strange :S
>>>
>>> >> @Everyone:
>>>
>>> >> Sigma 3.0 INSTALLED fine under my following specs:
>>>
>>> >> Windows7 x86 7600 OEM
>>> >> T5500 core 2 duo
>>> >> 3GB Ram
>>> >> GMA950 "Sigma 3.0"
>>>
>>> >> and ever since last week, my laptop's been running fine..though, the
>>> >> only performance increase i found was under NFS7/8...i tested OpenGL
>>> >> under CS 1.6 and the game still lags like **** :( am getting CS:S and
>>> >> WoW to do more testings.
>>>
>>> >> The new IMPROVED "reg" tweak is giving lots of performance increase
>>> >> indeed...now i was gonna test the "reg" tweak on Alpha drives to see
>>> >> if the Sigma 3.0 really is better with or without this "reg" tweak but
>>> >> i didn't have the time :( i'll be trying it ASAP.
>>>
>>> >> Also...i've got a problem running two games "NOT BECAUSE OF THE
>>> >> DRIVER" CS 1.6 exits suddenly after like 2-3 minutes of game
>>> >> play...and it doesn't just happen once or twice...i get bored of
>>> >> trying it again and again....and again...unless i set HL.exe to a HIGH
>>> >> CPU PRIORITY...the game would keep on CTD now and then....also, L4D
>>> >> seems to be giving me quite the trouble too...just after the game
>>> >> reaches the loading part it also goes to CTD, re-installed it many
>>> >> times...but still same ****...if anybody have idea on how to fix the
>>> >> issues, i'd really appreciate it :)
>>>
>>> >> On Apr 23, 7:46 pm, Gerard <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > The drivers were actually worse. The new .reg is what is great lol.
>>>
>>> >> > On Apr 23, 7:04 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > your saying L4D runs better with these drivers then Alpha?
>>>
>>> >> > > I barely noticed a difference in inf files when compared to Alpha.
>>> >> > > Thats just me though. But was was changed 965 and 945 users? Like 
>>> >> > > what
>>> >> > > inf settings?
>>>
>>> >> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gerard <[email protected]> 
>>> >> > > wrote:
>>> >> > > > installed on 950, but installer doesn't work. With new .reg l4d is
>>> >> > > > playable!
>>>
>>> >> > > > On Apr 23, 11:19 am, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >> I don't think so :)
>>>
>>> >> > > >> On Apr 22, 6:21 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > Hmm, does anyone here remember when MAD_BEAST said that we only 
>>> >> > > >> > had 1
>>> >> > > >> > spot for new drivers? Since updates for older drivers isn't 
>>> >> > > >> > allowed,
>>> >> > > >> > doesn't that mean that its now taken up by Sigma 3.0?
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, NeoDragon 
>>> >> > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >> > > As of today I'll be a bit less here, my new job is starting 
>>> >> > > >> > > tomorrow
>>> >> > > >> > > ( believe it or not, I plant tree's in the spring/summer, so 
>>> >> > > >> > > your kids
>>> >> > > >> > > can actually have some air to breathe... and it's good for my 
>>> >> > > >> > > wallet
>>> >> > > >> > > too XD ) but I'll stop by everynow and then to see what's 
>>> >> > > >> > > going on.
>>> >> > > >> > > Keep the idea's coming and in order, cause I already have 
>>> >> > > >> > > some good
>>> >> > > >> > > idea's for the next Drivers :). Don't expect them until Intel 
>>> >> > > >> > > release
>>> >> > > >> > > an official updated driver package first tho, as we need them 
>>> >> > > >> > > to fix
>>> >> > > >> > > some of the **** work they're known to be doing.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > > Oh, and make sure you try Sigma 3.0 !!! =)
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > > On Apr 20, 1:25 am, IronyTaken <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >> > > >> > >> I use Windows 7 and I downloaded the Alpha drivers from the 
>>> >> > > >> > >> site.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >>http://9xxssf.info/downloads/
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> On Apr 19, 7:56 pm, DanielPK <[email protected]> 
>>> >> > > >> > >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > @lolattheotherguy & Espi
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > guys thanx for the tips...but i don't think its about 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > dusting or
>>> >> > > >> > >> > anything like that...its abt the voltage of my C2D and the 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > voltage my
>>> >> > > >> > >> > mobo supports...hmmmm...i think one is higher than the 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > other...which
>>> >> > > >> > >> > means its the CPU XD so thats why its generating the 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > heat..couple of
>>> >> > > >> > >> > days ago i did full dust blowing with a thin-tip 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > compressed air...got
>>> >> > > >> > >> > all the dust out, and the thermal paste is still fine i 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > see :)
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > @irony....thats strange o_0...are u using windows7 ?? 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > because i found
>>> >> > > >> > >> > this settings under this OS..maybe..also, are u using 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > Neo's driver?
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > On Apr 20, 7:07 am, IronyTaken <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > I don't have that feature listed.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > This is what I have.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > >http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t276/RyviusRanger/display.png
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > On Apr 19, 4:07 am, DanielPK 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -select "Screen resolution" from the desktop 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > properties.
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -click on "Advanced Settings"
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -go to the driver tab and click graphic properties
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -go to Display settings tab
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -click on power settings and you should find a "Slider"
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > if u want more heat set to "Disable power saving" else 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > try "Good power
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > saving"
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > experiment with different settings...i get more FPS 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > but with sacrifice
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > to more heat generated :( maybe you'll have different 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > luck!
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > On Apr 19, 4:30 pm, IronyTaken <[email protected]> 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > I don't see it.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > I went into my display settings under the graphics 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > options and didn't
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > see it.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, DanielPK 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > there is this option when we check the settings of 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > the GMA950...under
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Display settings>>>>Power Settings.
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Power saving and performance settings...changing 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > that to "Disable
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > power saving" has made a huge FPS increase for 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > some of the games i
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > play...but with the side effect or more heat :( 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > ...also if u click on
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > "Modify Settings" you get another window with 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > (intel rapid memory
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > power management) and (intel smart 2D display 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > technology) do any of
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > these settings affect game/pc performance??
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > On Apr 19, 2:14 pm, hussam aulaian 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > @THEfog : u r totaly right
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > guys , they hav amazing guides
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > --
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > --
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Subscription 
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > settings:http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming/subscribe?hl=en
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > --
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > --
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > --
>>> >> > > >> > >> > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> > --
>>> >> > > >> > >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > >> --
>>> >> > > >> > >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > > --
>>> >> > > >> > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > --
>>> >> > > >> > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >> > > >> > --
>>> >> > > >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > >> --
>>> >> > > >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > > --
>>> >> > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > > --
>>> >> > > Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> >> > > --
>>> >> > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> >> --
>>> >> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> > --
>>> > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>>
>>> --
>>> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>>>
>>> --
>>> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>
>> --
>> INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Espionage724 Has A Signature...
>



-- 
Espionage724 Has A Signature...

-- 
INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS

Reply via email to