The MSI was "re-added" on the x64( it was removed by Intel themself in the x64 ) but not enabled. It actually decreased performance and added a few lag spike so I decided not to enable it for this release until I or someone else found a way to make it work like it should (Something your little program didn't catch up because you've checked the 32-bit version wich I haven't test AT ALL.
On Apr 23, 8:14 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > lol :p > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:10 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > lol, espi, im curious juz like u are, but i dont have much free time > > nowadays.... > > there are certain different from my V1.1 though... > > ofcoz the names change, async thngy, and others mention in ur doc, but im > > not seeing the the Message Signaled Interrupt being enabled in Sigma > > 3....and some features that i need to find in depth (lol, in depth or word > > of the WEEK LOL).. > > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >> Well I probably would of missed the Score thing and the async thing :p > >> Plus i now know that such a program exists. > > >> Anyway, if it boosts performance for others, then I guess thats cool, > >> I just wanted to know what was exactly changed to try to use it on my > >> XP MD. > > >> Also if I heard correctly, I think this actually might count as a > >> driver by itself, which means it would of taken up that one driver > >> spot we had. > > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Its only EC not EC 6, also this is the quick 32bit one I've did ;) . > >> > The one I sent you personally added another 2 function specially for > >> > your Device ID. > > >> > You used a program to actually check the changed things...... -_- > > >> > On Apr 23, 3:36 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> No deleted is red with a cross through it, and then next to it is the > >> >> changed character. Green is added. > > >> >> [i965GM1] > >> >> FeatureScore=EC 6 > > >> >> On Apr 23, 6:35 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > Recommended to just download the .doc instead of trying to use google > >> >> > viewer or HTML to view. > > >> >> > Changes are in green, deleted is in red. Or maybe added is in green, > >> >> > idk > > >> >> > On Apr 23, 6:33 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > Differences are inside the DOC file of the 965 stock vs Sigma 3 > >> >> > > (x86) > > >> >> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Espionage724 > >> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > > In the x86 versions of the Sigma 3 and 965 package from intel, > >> >> > > > the > >> >> > > > only difference is > > >> >> > > > - Async option > >> >> > > > - Memory > >> >> > > > - Named drivers > > >> >> > > > theres a few other minor changes, I'll find em later > > >> >> > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Espionage724 > >> >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >> Well i only quickly analyzed the INF but now I guess ill do a > >> >> > > >> more > >> >> > > >> indeph look :p > > >> >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:33 PM, NeoDragon > >> >> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >>> As I said earlier , info on that won't be released to public > >> >> > > >>> just > >> >> > > >>> yet ;) . But, I'm kinda ashamed that you can't see what's > >> >> > > >>> changed by > >> >> > > >>> yourself..... > > >> >> > > >>> On Apr 23, 12:06 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >>> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> But wait? Nobody still never answered what was changed in the > >> >> > > >>>> INF lol. > >> >> > > >>>> because in theroy, 965 users could use Alpha drivers and still > >> >> > > >>>> get the > >> >> > > >>>> same performance as sigma 3. > > >> >> > > >>>> I'mma go find out for myself what Sigma 2 was based on here... > > >> >> > > >>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, NeoDragon > >> >> > > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> > @Gerard : These are 965 Drivers.... I told people that they > >> >> > > >>>> > might > >> >> > > >>>> > wanna try, but It's not a 100% sure that you're gonna be > >> >> > > >>>> > able to > >> >> > > >>>> > install it under the 950 ( or for the matter get all the > >> >> > > >>>> > tweaks ) > > >> >> > > >>>> > @DanielPk: Play with the 3DSettings in the intel control > >> >> > > >>>> > Panel. I > >> >> > > >>>> > found that using the "Driver memory footprint" in low > >> >> > > >>>> > usually gives > >> >> > > >>>> > you a good boost for opengl . Might wanna try putting > >> >> > > >>>> > Asynchronous on > >> >> > > >>>> > ( V-Sync ) wich should help quite a bit too. > > >> >> > > >>>> > On Apr 23, 7:25 am, DanielPK <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >>>> > wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> >> @Irony: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> bro, i manage the site, and the links are UPDATED "i > >> >> > > >>>> >> haven't included > >> >> > > >>>> >> Sigma 3.0 YET as we still need more testings" but..am not > >> >> > > >>>> >> sure at > >> >> > > >>>> >> all..that is pretty strange :S > > >> >> > > >>>> >> @Everyone: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> Sigma 3.0 INSTALLED fine under my following specs: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> Windows7 x86 7600 OEM > >> >> > > >>>> >> T5500 core 2 duo > >> >> > > >>>> >> 3GB Ram > >> >> > > >>>> >> GMA950 "Sigma 3.0" > > >> >> > > >>>> >> and ever since last week, my laptop's been running > >> >> > > >>>> >> fine..though, the > >> >> > > >>>> >> only performance increase i found was under NFS7/8...i > >> >> > > >>>> >> tested OpenGL > >> >> > > >>>> >> under CS 1.6 and the game still lags like **** :( am > >> >> > > >>>> >> getting CS:S and > >> >> > > >>>> >> WoW to do more testings. > > >> >> > > >>>> >> The new IMPROVED "reg" tweak is giving lots of performance > >> >> > > >>>> >> increase > >> >> > > >>>> >> indeed...now i was gonna test the "reg" tweak on Alpha > >> >> > > >>>> >> drives to see > >> >> > > >>>> >> if the Sigma 3.0 really is better with or without this > >> >> > > >>>> >> "reg" tweak but > >> >> > > >>>> >> i didn't have the time :( i'll be trying it ASAP. > > >> >> > > >>>> >> Also...i've got a problem running two games "NOT BECAUSE OF > >> >> > > >>>> >> THE > >> >> > > >>>> >> DRIVER" CS 1.6 exits suddenly after like 2-3 minutes of > >> >> > > >>>> >> game > >> >> > > >>>> >> play...and it doesn't just happen once or twice...i get > >> >> > > >>>> >> bored of > >> >> > > >>>> >> trying it again and again....and again...unless i set > >> >> > > >>>> >> HL.exe to a HIGH > >> >> > > >>>> >> CPU PRIORITY...the game would keep on CTD now and > >> >> > > >>>> >> then....also, L4D > >> >> > > >>>> >> seems to be giving me quite the trouble too...just after > >> >> > > >>>> >> the game > >> >> > > >>>> >> reaches the loading part it also goes to CTD, re-installed > >> >> > > >>>> >> it many > >> >> > > >>>> >> times...but still same ****...if anybody have idea on how > >> >> > > >>>> >> to fix the > >> >> > > >>>> >> issues, i'd really appreciate it :) > > >> >> > > >>>> >> On Apr 23, 7:46 pm, Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > The drivers were actually worse. The new .reg is what is > >> >> > > >>>> >> > great lol. > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > On Apr 23, 7:04 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > >> >> > > >>>> >> > wrote: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > your saying L4D runs better with these drivers then > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > Alpha? > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > I barely noticed a difference in inf files when > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > compared to Alpha. > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > Thats just me though. But was was changed 965 and 945 > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > users? Like what > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > inf settings? > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gerard > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > > installed on 950, but installer doesn't work. With > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > > new .reg l4d is > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > > playable! > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > > On Apr 23, 11:19 am, NeoDragon > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> I don't think so :) > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> On Apr 22, 6:21 pm, Espionage724 > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > Hmm, does anyone here remember when MAD_BEAST said > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > that we only had 1 > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > spot for new drivers? Since updates for older > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > drivers isn't allowed, > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > doesn't that mean that its now taken up by Sigma > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > 3.0? > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, NeoDragon > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > As of today I'll be a bit less here, my new job > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > is starting tomorrow > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > ( believe it or not, I plant tree's in the > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > spring/summer, so your kids > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > can actually have some air to breathe... and > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > it's good for my wallet > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > too XD ) but I'll stop by everynow and then to > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > see what's going on. > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > Keep the idea's coming and in order, cause I > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > already have some good > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > idea's for the next Drivers :). Don't expect > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > them until Intel release > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > an official updated driver package first tho, as > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > we need them to fix > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > some of the **** work they're known to be doing. > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > Oh, and make sure you try Sigma 3.0 !!! =) > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > On Apr 20, 1:25 am, IronyTaken > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> I use Windows 7 and I downloaded the Alpha > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> drivers from the site. > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >>http://9xxssf.info/downloads/ > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> On Apr 19, 7:56 pm, DanielPK > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > @lolattheotherguy & Espi > > ... > > read more » -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS Subscription settings: http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming/subscribe?hl=en
