lol, espi, im curious juz like u are, but i dont have much free time nowadays.... there are certain different from my V1.1 though...
ofcoz the names change, async thngy, and others mention in ur doc, but im not seeing the the Message Signaled Interrupt being enabled in Sigma 3....and some features that i need to find in depth (lol, in depth or word of the WEEK LOL).. On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Espionage724 <[email protected]>wrote: > Well I probably would of missed the Score thing and the async thing :p > Plus i now know that such a program exists. > > Anyway, if it boosts performance for others, then I guess thats cool, > I just wanted to know what was exactly changed to try to use it on my > XP MD. > > Also if I heard correctly, I think this actually might count as a > driver by itself, which means it would of taken up that one driver > spot we had. > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:30 PM, NeoDragon <[email protected]> wrote: > > Its only EC not EC 6, also this is the quick 32bit one I've did ;) . > > The one I sent you personally added another 2 function specially for > > your Device ID. > > > > You used a program to actually check the changed things...... -_- > > > > On Apr 23, 3:36 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> No deleted is red with a cross through it, and then next to it is the > >> changed character. Green is added. > >> > >> [i965GM1] > >> FeatureScore=EC 6 > >> > >> On Apr 23, 6:35 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > Recommended to just download the .doc instead of trying to use google > >> > viewer or HTML to view. > >> > >> > Changes are in green, deleted is in red. Or maybe added is in green, > >> > idk > >> > >> > On Apr 23, 6:33 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > Differences are inside the DOC file of the 965 stock vs Sigma 3 > (x86) > >> > >> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > In the x86 versions of the Sigma 3 and 965 package from intel, the > >> > > > only difference is > >> > >> > > > - Async option > >> > > > - Memory > >> > > > - Named drivers > >> > >> > > > theres a few other minor changes, I'll find em later > >> > >> > > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> Well i only quickly analyzed the INF but now I guess ill do a > more > >> > > >> indeph look :p > >> > >> > > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:33 PM, NeoDragon < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >>> As I said earlier , info on that won't be released to public > just > >> > > >>> yet ;) . But, I'm kinda ashamed that you can't see what's > changed by > >> > > >>> yourself..... > >> > >> > > >>> On Apr 23, 12:06 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >>>> But wait? Nobody still never answered what was changed in the > INF lol. > >> > > >>>> because in theroy, 965 users could use Alpha drivers and still > get the > >> > > >>>> same performance as sigma 3. > >> > >> > > >>>> I'mma go find out for myself what Sigma 2 was based on here... > >> > >> > > >>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:00 PM, NeoDragon < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >>>> > @Gerard : These are 965 Drivers.... I told people that they > might > >> > > >>>> > wanna try, but It's not a 100% sure that you're gonna be able > to > >> > > >>>> > install it under the 950 ( or for the matter get all the > tweaks ) > >> > >> > > >>>> > @DanielPk: Play with the 3DSettings in the intel control > Panel. I > >> > > >>>> > found that using the "Driver memory footprint" in low usually > gives > >> > > >>>> > you a good boost for opengl . Might wanna try putting > Asynchronous on > >> > > >>>> > ( V-Sync ) wich should help quite a bit too. > >> > >> > > >>>> > On Apr 23, 7:25 am, DanielPK <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >>>> >> @Irony: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> bro, i manage the site, and the links are UPDATED "i haven't > included > >> > > >>>> >> Sigma 3.0 YET as we still need more testings" but..am not > sure at > >> > > >>>> >> all..that is pretty strange :S > >> > >> > > >>>> >> @Everyone: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> Sigma 3.0 INSTALLED fine under my following specs: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> Windows7 x86 7600 OEM > >> > > >>>> >> T5500 core 2 duo > >> > > >>>> >> 3GB Ram > >> > > >>>> >> GMA950 "Sigma 3.0" > >> > >> > > >>>> >> and ever since last week, my laptop's been running > fine..though, the > >> > > >>>> >> only performance increase i found was under NFS7/8...i > tested OpenGL > >> > > >>>> >> under CS 1.6 and the game still lags like **** :( am getting > CS:S and > >> > > >>>> >> WoW to do more testings. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> The new IMPROVED "reg" tweak is giving lots of performance > increase > >> > > >>>> >> indeed...now i was gonna test the "reg" tweak on Alpha > drives to see > >> > > >>>> >> if the Sigma 3.0 really is better with or without this "reg" > tweak but > >> > > >>>> >> i didn't have the time :( i'll be trying it ASAP. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> Also...i've got a problem running two games "NOT BECAUSE OF > THE > >> > > >>>> >> DRIVER" CS 1.6 exits suddenly after like 2-3 minutes of game > >> > > >>>> >> play...and it doesn't just happen once or twice...i get > bored of > >> > > >>>> >> trying it again and again....and again...unless i set HL.exe > to a HIGH > >> > > >>>> >> CPU PRIORITY...the game would keep on CTD now and > then....also, L4D > >> > > >>>> >> seems to be giving me quite the trouble too...just after the > game > >> > > >>>> >> reaches the loading part it also goes to CTD, re-installed > it many > >> > > >>>> >> times...but still same ****...if anybody have idea on how to > fix the > >> > > >>>> >> issues, i'd really appreciate it :) > >> > >> > > >>>> >> On Apr 23, 7:46 pm, Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > The drivers were actually worse. The new .reg is what is > great lol. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > On Apr 23, 7:04 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > your saying L4D runs better with these drivers then > Alpha? > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > I barely noticed a difference in inf files when compared > to Alpha. > >> > > >>>> >> > > Thats just me though. But was was changed 965 and 945 > users? Like what > >> > > >>>> >> > > inf settings? > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Gerard < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >>>> >> > > > installed on 950, but installer doesn't work. With new > .reg l4d is > >> > > >>>> >> > > > playable! > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > > On Apr 23, 11:19 am, NeoDragon <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> I don't think so :) > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> On Apr 22, 6:21 pm, Espionage724 < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > Hmm, does anyone here remember when MAD_BEAST said > that we only had 1 > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > spot for new drivers? Since updates for older > drivers isn't allowed, > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > doesn't that mean that its now taken up by Sigma > 3.0? > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:10 PM, NeoDragon < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > As of today I'll be a bit less here, my new job > is starting tomorrow > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > ( believe it or not, I plant tree's in the > spring/summer, so your kids > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > can actually have some air to breathe... and it's > good for my wallet > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > too XD ) but I'll stop by everynow and then to > see what's going on. > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > Keep the idea's coming and in order, cause I > already have some good > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > idea's for the next Drivers :). Don't expect them > until Intel release > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > an official updated driver package first tho, as > we need them to fix > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > some of the **** work they're known to be doing. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > Oh, and make sure you try Sigma 3.0 !!! =) > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > > On Apr 20, 1:25 am, IronyTaken < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> I use Windows 7 and I downloaded the Alpha > drivers from the site. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >>http://9xxssf.info/downloads/ > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> On Apr 19, 7:56 pm, DanielPK < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > @lolattheotherguy & Espi > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > guys thanx for the tips...but i don't think > its about dusting or > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > anything like that...its abt the voltage of my > C2D and the voltage my > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > mobo supports...hmmmm...i think one is higher > than the other...which > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > means its the CPU XD so thats why its > generating the heat..couple of > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > days ago i did full dust blowing with a > thin-tip compressed air...got > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > all the dust out, and the thermal paste is > still fine i see :) > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > @irony....thats strange o_0...are u using > windows7 ?? because i found > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > this settings under this OS..maybe..also, are > u using Neo's driver? > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > On Apr 20, 7:07 am, IronyTaken < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > I don't have that feature listed. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > This is what I have. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t276/RyviusRanger/display.png > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > On Apr 19, 4:07 am, DanielPK < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -select "Screen resolution" from the > desktop properties. > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -click on "Advanced Settings" > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -go to the driver tab and click graphic > properties > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -go to Display settings tab > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > -click on power settings and you should > find a "Slider" > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > if u want more heat set to "Disable power > saving" else try "Good power > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > saving" > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > experiment with different settings...i get > more FPS but with sacrifice > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > to more heat generated :( maybe you'll > have different luck! > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > On Apr 19, 4:30 pm, IronyTaken < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > I don't see it. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > I went into my display settings under > the graphics options and didn't > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > see it. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, DanielPK < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > there is this option when we check the > settings of the GMA950...under > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Display settings>>>>Power Settings. > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > Power saving and performance > settings...changing that to "Disable > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > power saving" has made a huge FPS > increase for some of the games i > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > play...but with the side effect or > more heat :( ...also if u click on > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > "Modify Settings" you get another > window with (intel rapid memory > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > power management) and (intel smart 2D > display technology) do any of > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > these settings affect game/pc > performance?? > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > On Apr 19, 2:14 pm, hussam aulaian < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > @THEfog : u r totaly right > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > guys , they hav amazing guides > >> > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > >> > > >>>> >> > > >> > >> > > > > > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS > >> > >> ... > >> > >> read more ยป > > > > -- > > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > Subscription settings: > http://groups.google.com/group/intel9x-gaming/subscribe?hl=en > > > > > > -- > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- INTEL 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
