about the auto aspect ratio thingy, V series driver still and never will force aspect ratios...it is fully customizable like the V1.0 and V1.1..the original CP can control almost everything for the V1.0 and V1.1 accept that V1.1 wont work on netbook unless ur lucky...V1.2 however takes what ever good from those V1.0 and V1.1,making them better with MSI-X and advance CP...yeah , ive think about that, thus i made my own CP..adding gamer's profile, advance 3D control for Direct3D and OpenGL..and some features under testing..including overcloking tab, but until now still wont work..lol...sound's like ATI Overdrive? hehe, it will be GMAOverdrive if it's working finally...
as i said before, this may be my last work, so ive made my best for this community... On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:13 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if it would be impossible to use one from other driver > versions, even from drivers made for other os's. But the big question > is if it would be worth the trouble. > > On Jun 9, 9:09 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > My guess is that his drivers would use different registry settings and > > everything, so hmm, idk if a CP from another driver would work either. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So we are to expect increases in both performance and stability across > > > the board, bigger than those other md's released for windows 7? > > > Not that I'm concerned, but I've also read that some people had issues > > > with some md's regarding the whole auto aspect ratio thing with > > > different resolutions. Since I'm guessing you won't provide with a > > > control panel, will there be any way to adjust any parameters and > > > configs after the driver is installed or must any changes desires be > > > done previous to the driver install? > > > > > On Jun 9, 5:19 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> it's not wrong actually, i intend to make msi-x compatible with > 945...since > > >> v1.1, 945 does not even support msi actually till my v1.1 enables > it...im > > >> still testing with the compatibility right now but i can assure u that > it > > >> can improve performance triple if not double the v1.1 currently... > > > > >> and on ur 2nd question, msi does not decrease performance on some > hardware, > > >> i think ur misunderstand it with IFS or increase fixed > segmentation...that > > >> were introduced on V1.1 1st beta but it came down to be buggy so i > disabled > > >> it on the final V1.1...damn i remember when someone actually sabotage > my > > >> original v1.1 in the download section which gives out poor > performance...but > > >> it was fix when i reuploaded the correct one..make sure u downloaded > the > > >> V1.1_fixed filename... > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:00 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > I was reading the V1.2 md showcase pdf, and noticed that it is > > >> > supposed to be msi-x compatible. After a bit of research I did find > > >> > that it would really improve performance, but seems it only exists > on > > >> > 965 and upwards, the 945 being only msi compatible. I just hope I'm > > >> > terribly wrong about this. And what was discussed a few on a post a > > >> > month or so that enabling msi could decrease performance with > certain > > >> > hardware specs? > > > > >> > -- > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
