well, to put it simply, making a program to work with the driver itself is painfully hard (for me at least) some of the feature i plan to include to the CP are:
- Actual overclocking for GMA core(currently under testing, not quite sure it's dangerous or not) if not at least to 400MHz as default. - Direct3D option such as double buffer or triple if CPU supported, custom resolution, gamer profile, mip mapping optimization and etc.. and some of the implant i currently working such as video hardware to watch HD or 720p/1080p and overlay acceleration...flash hardware support to less burden the cpu...much useful for Atom CPu or single core,,, On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:49 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > I asked about the aspect ratio thing only based on feedback regarding > some md's, because myself haven't had any issues like that. > Would making a CP take too much time and effort? The way you put > things, your CP would sound powerful. Even basic things like triple > buffering on direct3d would be great to be accessible. What other > features are you testing, if you could reveal a bit about them? And > when you mean overclocking you mean resetting the gma clock to desktop > defaults like gmabooster, or you mean actual overclocking? And if > something like that did end up on your CP we should make a poll for > its name :) > GMA CoreDrive? It's my take, but perhaps because I always liked the > OSX 10 audio scheme based on CoreAudio. > > On Jun 10, 4:49 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > about the auto aspect ratio thingy, V series driver still and never will > > force aspect ratios...it is fully customizable like the V1.0 and > V1.1..the > > original CP can control almost everything for the V1.0 and V1.1 accept > that > > V1.1 wont work on netbook unless ur lucky...V1.2 however takes what ever > > good from those V1.0 and V1.1,making them better with MSI-X and advance > > CP...yeah , ive think about that, thus i made my own CP..adding gamer's > > profile, advance 3D control for Direct3D and OpenGL..and some features > under > > testing..including overcloking tab, but until now still wont > > work..lol...sound's like ATI Overdrive? hehe, it will be GMAOverdrive if > > it's working finally... > > > > as i said before, this may be my last work, so ive made my best for this > > community... > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:13 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I wonder if it would be impossible to use one from other driver > > > versions, even from drivers made for other os's. But the big question > > > is if it would be worth the trouble. > > > > > On Jun 9, 9:09 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > My guess is that his drivers would use different registry settings > and > > > > everything, so hmm, idk if a CP from another driver would work > either. > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > So we are to expect increases in both performance and stability > across > > > > > the board, bigger than those other md's released for windows 7? > > > > > Not that I'm concerned, but I've also read that some people had > issues > > > > > with some md's regarding the whole auto aspect ratio thing with > > > > > different resolutions. Since I'm guessing you won't provide with a > > > > > control panel, will there be any way to adjust any parameters and > > > > > configs after the driver is installed or must any changes desires > be > > > > > done previous to the driver install? > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 5:19 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> it's not wrong actually, i intend to make msi-x compatible with > > > 945...since > > > > >> v1.1, 945 does not even support msi actually till my v1.1 enables > > > it...im > > > > >> still testing with the compatibility right now but i can assure u > that > > > it > > > > >> can improve performance triple if not double the v1.1 currently... > > > > > > >> and on ur 2nd question, msi does not decrease performance on some > > > hardware, > > > > >> i think ur misunderstand it with IFS or increase fixed > > > segmentation...that > > > > >> were introduced on V1.1 1st beta but it came down to be buggy so i > > > disabled > > > > >> it on the final V1.1...damn i remember when someone actually > sabotage > > > my > > > > >> original v1.1 in the download section which gives out poor > > > performance...but > > > > >> it was fix when i reuploaded the correct one..make sure u > downloaded > > > the > > > > >> V1.1_fixed filename... > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:00 PM, tribaljet <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > >> > I was reading the V1.2 md showcase pdf, and noticed that it is > > > > >> > supposed to be msi-x compatible. After a bit of research I did > find > > > > >> > that it would really improve performance, but seems it only > exists > > > on > > > > >> > 965 and upwards, the 945 being only msi compatible. I just hope > I'm > > > > >> > terribly wrong about this. And what was discussed a few on a > post a > > > > >> > month or so that enabling msi could decrease performance with > > > certain > > > > >> > hardware specs? > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
