lol, never mind walking on water...my heads spinning around...some body stop me...lol...
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:52 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > Seriously, you can't go away, if you continue like this you're going > to walk on water... > > On Jun 10, 12:43 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > well, to put it simply, making a program to work with the driver itself > is > > painfully hard (for me at least) > > some of the feature i plan to include to the CP are: > > > > - Actual overclocking for GMA core(currently under testing, not quite > sure > > it's dangerous or not) if not at least to 400MHz as default. > > - Direct3D option such as double buffer or triple if CPU supported, > custom > > resolution, gamer profile, mip mapping optimization and etc.. > > and some of the implant i currently working such as video hardware to > watch > > HD or 720p/1080p and overlay acceleration...flash hardware support to > less > > burden the cpu...much useful for Atom CPu or single core,,, > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:49 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I asked about the aspect ratio thing only based on feedback regarding > > > some md's, because myself haven't had any issues like that. > > > Would making a CP take too much time and effort? The way you put > > > things, your CP would sound powerful. Even basic things like triple > > > buffering on direct3d would be great to be accessible. What other > > > features are you testing, if you could reveal a bit about them? And > > > when you mean overclocking you mean resetting the gma clock to desktop > > > defaults like gmabooster, or you mean actual overclocking? And if > > > something like that did end up on your CP we should make a poll for > > > its name :) > > > GMA CoreDrive? It's my take, but perhaps because I always liked the > > > OSX 10 audio scheme based on CoreAudio. > > > > > On Jun 10, 4:49 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > about the auto aspect ratio thingy, V series driver still and never > will > > > > force aspect ratios...it is fully customizable like the V1.0 and > > > V1.1..the > > > > original CP can control almost everything for the V1.0 and V1.1 > accept > > > that > > > > V1.1 wont work on netbook unless ur lucky...V1.2 however takes what > ever > > > > good from those V1.0 and V1.1,making them better with MSI-X and > advance > > > > CP...yeah , ive think about that, thus i made my own CP..adding > gamer's > > > > profile, advance 3D control for Direct3D and OpenGL..and some > features > > > under > > > > testing..including overcloking tab, but until now still wont > > > > work..lol...sound's like ATI Overdrive? hehe, it will be GMAOverdrive > if > > > > it's working finally... > > > > > > as i said before, this may be my last work, so ive made my best for > this > > > > community... > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:13 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > I wonder if it would be impossible to use one from other driver > > > > > versions, even from drivers made for other os's. But the big > question > > > > > is if it would be worth the trouble. > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 9:09 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > My guess is that his drivers would use different registry > settings > > > and > > > > > > everything, so hmm, idk if a CP from another driver would work > > > either. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, tribaljet <[email protected] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > So we are to expect increases in both performance and stability > > > across > > > > > > > the board, bigger than those other md's released for windows 7? > > > > > > > Not that I'm concerned, but I've also read that some people had > > > issues > > > > > > > with some md's regarding the whole auto aspect ratio thing with > > > > > > > different resolutions. Since I'm guessing you won't provide > with a > > > > > > > control panel, will there be any way to adjust any parameters > and > > > > > > > configs after the driver is installed or must any changes > desires > > > be > > > > > > > done previous to the driver install? > > > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 5:19 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > >> it's not wrong actually, i intend to make msi-x compatible > with > > > > > 945...since > > > > > > >> v1.1, 945 does not even support msi actually till my v1.1 > enables > > > > > it...im > > > > > > >> still testing with the compatibility right now but i can > assure u > > > that > > > > > it > > > > > > >> can improve performance triple if not double the v1.1 > currently... > > > > > > > > >> and on ur 2nd question, msi does not decrease performance on > some > > > > > hardware, > > > > > > >> i think ur misunderstand it with IFS or increase fixed > > > > > segmentation...that > > > > > > >> were introduced on V1.1 1st beta but it came down to be buggy > so i > > > > > disabled > > > > > > >> it on the final V1.1...damn i remember when someone actually > > > sabotage > > > > > my > > > > > > >> original v1.1 in the download section which gives out poor > > > > > performance...but > > > > > > >> it was fix when i reuploaded the correct one..make sure u > > > downloaded > > > > > the > > > > > > >> V1.1_fixed filename... > > > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:00 PM, tribaljet < > [email protected] > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > I was reading the V1.2 md showcase pdf, and noticed that it > is > > > > > > >> > supposed to be msi-x compatible. After a bit of research I > did > > > find > > > > > > >> > that it would really improve performance, but seems it only > > > exists > > > > > on > > > > > > >> > 965 and upwards, the 945 being only msi compatible. I just > hope > > > I'm > > > > > > >> > terribly wrong about this. And what was discussed a few on a > > > post a > > > > > > >> > month or so that enabling msi could decrease performance > with > > > > > certain > > > > > > >> > hardware specs? > > > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... > > > > > > > -- > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > -- > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
