Daniel K was awesome.... I liked Universal Creative Alchemy :) On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:00 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > hopefully they wont come after you like creative did with daniel k :) > we'll get you into hiding. would you be interested in a sex change > operation or a run of the mill plastic operation would be enough? :) > > On Jun 10, 12:56 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> lol, never mind walking on water...my heads spinning around...some body stop >> me...lol... >> >> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:52 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Seriously, you can't go away, if you continue like this you're going >> > to walk on water... >> >> > On Jun 10, 12:43 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > well, to put it simply, making a program to work with the driver itself >> > is >> > > painfully hard (for me at least) >> > > some of the feature i plan to include to the CP are: >> >> > > - Actual overclocking for GMA core(currently under testing, not quite >> > sure >> > > it's dangerous or not) if not at least to 400MHz as default. >> > > - Direct3D option such as double buffer or triple if CPU supported, >> > custom >> > > resolution, gamer profile, mip mapping optimization and etc.. >> > > and some of the implant i currently working such as video hardware to >> > watch >> > > HD or 720p/1080p and overlay acceleration...flash hardware support to >> > less >> > > burden the cpu...much useful for Atom CPu or single core,,, >> >> > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:49 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > I asked about the aspect ratio thing only based on feedback regarding >> > > > some md's, because myself haven't had any issues like that. >> > > > Would making a CP take too much time and effort? The way you put >> > > > things, your CP would sound powerful. Even basic things like triple >> > > > buffering on direct3d would be great to be accessible. What other >> > > > features are you testing, if you could reveal a bit about them? And >> > > > when you mean overclocking you mean resetting the gma clock to desktop >> > > > defaults like gmabooster, or you mean actual overclocking? And if >> > > > something like that did end up on your CP we should make a poll for >> > > > its name :) >> > > > GMA CoreDrive? It's my take, but perhaps because I always liked the >> > > > OSX 10 audio scheme based on CoreAudio. >> >> > > > On Jun 10, 4:49 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > about the auto aspect ratio thingy, V series driver still and never >> > will >> > > > > force aspect ratios...it is fully customizable like the V1.0 and >> > > > V1.1..the >> > > > > original CP can control almost everything for the V1.0 and V1.1 >> > accept >> > > > that >> > > > > V1.1 wont work on netbook unless ur lucky...V1.2 however takes what >> > ever >> > > > > good from those V1.0 and V1.1,making them better with MSI-X and >> > advance >> > > > > CP...yeah , ive think about that, thus i made my own CP..adding >> > gamer's >> > > > > profile, advance 3D control for Direct3D and OpenGL..and some >> > features >> > > > under >> > > > > testing..including overcloking tab, but until now still wont >> > > > > work..lol...sound's like ATI Overdrive? hehe, it will be GMAOverdrive >> > if >> > > > > it's working finally... >> >> > > > > as i said before, this may be my last work, so ive made my best for >> > this >> > > > > community... >> >> > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:13 AM, tribaljet <[email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > I wonder if it would be impossible to use one from other driver >> > > > > > versions, even from drivers made for other os's. But the big >> > question >> > > > > > is if it would be worth the trouble. >> >> > > > > > On Jun 9, 9:09 pm, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > My guess is that his drivers would use different registry >> > settings >> > > > and >> > > > > > > everything, so hmm, idk if a CP from another driver would work >> > > > either. >> >> > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 3:54 PM, tribaljet <[email protected] >> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > So we are to expect increases in both performance and stability >> > > > across >> > > > > > > > the board, bigger than those other md's released for windows 7? >> > > > > > > > Not that I'm concerned, but I've also read that some people had >> > > > issues >> > > > > > > > with some md's regarding the whole auto aspect ratio thing with >> > > > > > > > different resolutions. Since I'm guessing you won't provide >> > with a >> > > > > > > > control panel, will there be any way to adjust any parameters >> > and >> > > > > > > > configs after the driver is installed or must any changes >> > desires >> > > > be >> > > > > > > > done previous to the driver install? >> >> > > > > > > > On Jun 9, 5:19 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > > > >> it's not wrong actually, i intend to make msi-x compatible >> > with >> > > > > > 945...since >> > > > > > > >> v1.1, 945 does not even support msi actually till my v1.1 >> > enables >> > > > > > it...im >> > > > > > > >> still testing with the compatibility right now but i can >> > assure u >> > > > that >> > > > > > it >> > > > > > > >> can improve performance triple if not double the v1.1 >> > currently... >> >> > > > > > > >> and on ur 2nd question, msi does not decrease performance on >> > some >> > > > > > hardware, >> > > > > > > >> i think ur misunderstand it with IFS or increase fixed >> > > > > > segmentation...that >> > > > > > > >> were introduced on V1.1 1st beta but it came down to be buggy >> > so i >> > > > > > disabled >> > > > > > > >> it on the final V1.1...damn i remember when someone actually >> > > > sabotage >> > > > > > my >> > > > > > > >> original v1.1 in the download section which gives out poor >> > > > > > performance...but >> > > > > > > >> it was fix when i reuploaded the correct one..make sure u >> > > > downloaded >> > > > > > the >> > > > > > > >> V1.1_fixed filename... >> >> > > > > > > >> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:00 PM, tribaljet < >> > [email protected] >> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > I was reading the V1.2 md showcase pdf, and noticed that it >> > is >> > > > > > > >> > supposed to be msi-x compatible. After a bit of research I >> > did >> > > > find >> > > > > > > >> > that it would really improve performance, but seems it only >> > > > exists >> > > > > > on >> > > > > > > >> > 965 and upwards, the 945 being only msi compatible. I just >> > hope >> > > > I'm >> > > > > > > >> > terribly wrong about this. And what was discussed a few on a >> > > > post a >> > > > > > > >> > month or so that enabling msi could decrease performance >> > with >> > > > > > certain >> > > > > > > >> > hardware specs? >> >> > > > > > > >> > -- >> > > > > > > >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Espionage724 Has A Signature... >> >> > > > > > -- >> > > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > > -- >> > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > -- >> > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >> >> > > -- > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS >
-- Espionage724 Has A Signature... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
