I wonder, is the computational load of 3d always higher than 2d? On Jun 28, 3:37 am, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > Lol I actually know why this is so, GPU's have come such along way from the > days of 2D that running 2D games on newer cards will often cause lag and bad > fps even though these games could be played easily on computer 10-15 years > ago, the same applies for aero, it actually takes more processing power > (both CPU and GPU) to render a 2d environment because GPU's and Drivers are > optimized for 3D nowadays and therfore fall short when it comes to 2D > processing. So if you are running explorer.exe in non-aero you are > effectively running it in 2D therefore creating extra load. On GPU and CPU > functions, yes I know it Dosn't appear to make much sense but I find it > kinda funny that something that is so trivial can prove detrimental to > system performance, hope this helps. > > THEfog > > On 28/06/2010 12:03 PM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > True, some games have graphical glitches with it on, while others will > run awfully slow with it on too, sometimes it makes me wonder if there > is actually a rule of thumb about performance only settings. But even > though I like good performance, I won't have it if it means buggy > graphics, and I'm not also using swiftshader for a sm3/4 game to run > at 1fps. There has to be a balance for each hardware configuration. > > On Jun 28, 2:40 am, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > IMO the desktop composition is the k... > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 9:25 AM, uncleferassi <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Do I just have to... > >
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
