So true, but advertising is a huge business, and it shows all around us. I'm still waiting for true ssds to lower prices considerably :S
On Jul 19, 7:56 pm, lolattheotherguy <[email protected]> wrote: > i agree that for gaming, a huge framebuffer is not essential but thats > only until you dont have a system to run the game in hd, or as in my > case, you work with cg. > About preconfigured gamer PCs... I see a lot of em set up in such a > stupid way. You don't always have to go for the latest/most powerful, > its way better if everything matches (in terms of performance/power) > so you dont have a bottleneck. It sux ass to pay for a kickass gpu if > you are stuck with a half-decent cpu for example. I've worked in a PC > shop for a while and many times i actually talked costumers into > buying cheaper, slower devices if they werent going for an allround > system upgrade. > Well its nothing special, common sense... > > On Jul 19, 4:40 pm, tribaljet <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Yes, it's almost of no use to have such a big frame buffer on low to > > medium gpus, and yes a higher frame buffer is useful for higher > > resolutions and better/uncompressed textures. So, if the price > > difference is small you should go with a larger frame buffer, but if > > it's large then there is no point. > > > Even though it's a HD5xxx series, the HD5450 is still lower end, and > > as all products on that range, they all suck :) For desktops there is > > no excuse on getting a cheap and decent midrange card, while on > > laptops the talk is a bit different. > > > On Jul 19, 1:07 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > lol, i never knew that ^^ > > > but yeah, not all games can take full advantage with 1gb VRAM (in mid > > > range > > > cards that is), then again, most HD 5670 reviews that mentioned it's not > > > worthed for a 1gb GDDR5 on a HD5670, which is good for me though as im in > > > a > > > tight ass budget at that time..lol..512mb GDDR5 for me.. > > > also Fallout 3 and Crysis areinsanely memory hungry games with all that > > > texture and graphics stream of open world madness ^^ > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Demonicus <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > 1 gb vram is used to play on higher resolution (1920x1080), and > > > > working with graphics. Oh, and about hd5670 1gb is ok. Have you seen > > > > HD 5450 with it's 1gb gddr3? Yeah, THATS a garbage, it doesn't run > > > > every single new game with more than 20 fps, maybe except CSS > > > > > On Jul 19, 2:51 pm, AngelicTears <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > oh and tribaljet has a point on bigger VRAM doesnt mean performance... > > > > > before go and buy a somewhat 1GB GDDR5 with the thought "oh, 1gb > > > > > GDDR5, > > > > more > > > > > power"..rubbish.... > > > > > most GPU nowadays cant handle 1gb VRAM yet...and i mean the mid range > > > > > cards.. > > > > > basic for GPU buying guide, make sure the GPU can support the extra > > > > VRAM... > > > > > > for example..the HD 5670 / GT240 with 1gb GDDR5 is a rubbish product > > > > > juz > > > > for > > > > > commercial act / brag from the company... > > > > > as in fact their GPU cant produce enough power to process that much.. > > > > > except for HD 4870, 4870 x 2, GT460, GT 480, etc..etc...which IS a > > > > > high > > > > end > > > > > GPU which can in fact can support and give boost when pair up with > > > > > 1gb or > > > > > more VRAM... > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM, AngelicTears <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > lol @ PC bragger ^^ > > > > > > well, im the same with Espi...for most years in my life i played > > > > > > games > > > > on > > > > > > crappy hardware and i still can please myself playing them even on > > > > lowest > > > > > > setting available ^^ > > > > > > and i often played at Cyber Cafes or similar juz to play latest > > > > > > games > > > > and > > > > > > find out the most of them makes me bored at least for 30 minutes > > > > ..lol.. > > > > > > so im use to play games with 20 - 30 fps and it still good to me, > > > > > > even > > > > with > > > > > > my current desktop, i still like to tune and tweak my games, not > > > > everyone > > > > > > knows how to tweak their game setting to literally look good but > > > > > > run at > > > > good > > > > > > fps ^^ > > > > > > > but then again, some games are better off played in 30 fps, take Far > > > > Cry 2 > > > > > > for example, any fps above 30 will stutter, the only fix is to limit > > > > the fps > > > > > > to 30 and walla, no stuttering all the way ..not everyone knows that > > > > huh? > > > > > > also im am addicted to modding since i touch computer...literally i > > > > > > mod > > > > my > > > > > > HD 5670 (yes a mid range card, and slow to ppl with > > > > > > high-end-top-of-the-earth-hardware) but, with proper knowledge i was > > > > able to > > > > > > run most of the games with out no problem, not bad...better than > > > > someone who > > > > > > literally but hardware upgrade to juz play a certain game... > > > > > > > for myself, i still prefer gameplay over graphics,,that's my opinion > > > > that > > > > > > is.. > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:34 PM, tribaljet <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> For all down to earth people, I'm sorry for the way I spoke, but > > > > > >> talking down on systems who are perfectly capable of running > > > > > >> megapixel > > > > > >> games is unacceptable, specially since there was no reason. But > > > > > >> then > > > > > >> again, not everyone knows how to properly tune and maintain a > > > > > >> computer. > > > > > > >> On Jul 19, 2:43 am, Espionage724 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > >> > Meh acceptable to me is at least 30 lol. I played games many > > > > > >> > years > > > > on > > > > > >> > bad hardware so I'm just used to it lol. > > > > > > >> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Cef <[email protected]> > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > I don't know what you mean by acceptable FPS, my acceptable > > > > > >> > > amount > > > > is > > > > > >> > > solid 60 FPS with a maximum slowdown of 45, which is what I get > > > > with > > > > > >> > > 16x AF and around 8x AA, all on high or very high in Alien Vs > > > > > >> > > Predator, BioShock, Stranglehold, Street Fighter IV, Devil Mat > > > > > >> > > Cry > > > > IV, > > > > > >> > > Left 4 Dead 2, Borderlands and almost any game, except of > > > > > >> > > course > > > > GTA > > > > > >> > > IV, where frames go from 55 to 30 all on high, but with shadows > > > > off. > > > > > > >> > > If acceptable frames for you is 20 or 30, which would only give > > > > you a > > > > > >> > > choppy and stuttering game, then yeah GTA IV runs good in a > > > > Core2Duo, > > > > > >> > > only 2 GB of RAM, and a 8600 with 256 mb. Maybe on low and no > > > > > >> > > view > > > > > >> > > distance at all, or in medium with those flickering low > > > > > >> > > shadows, > > > > but > > > > > >> > > if I'd like to play an ugly looking and slow version of the > > > > > >> > > game > > > > I'd > > > > > >> > > get an XBOX 360 or a PS3. > > > > > > >> > > I still say, 4GB's of RAM, a QuadCore or Phenom II X3 BE, and > > > > > >> > > any > > > > GTX/ > > > > > >> > > HD4/5 GPU with 1 GB of memory, as minimum to run it smoothly. > > > > > > >> > > .C. > > > > > > >> > > -- > > > > > >> > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > Acer TravelMate 2480 > > > > > >> > GFX: GMA950 CPU: Intel Celeron M 420 @ 1.6Ghz RAM: 2GB DDR2 > > > > 333Mhz > > > > > >> > HDD: Samsung 120GB 5400RPM SATA > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Laptop: > > > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > > > hmmm : > > > > > > Athlon II X4 630 OCd @ 3.225GHz > > > > > > Sapphire HD 5670 512MB Artic Cooling > > > > > > MSI 770-C45 MoBo > > > > > > Kingston 2GB RAM DDR3 1333 > > > > > > 750GB Samsung SATA2 HDD > > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > > -- > > > > > Laptop: > > > > > Acer Aspire > > > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > > hmmm : > > > > > Athlon II X4 630 OCd @ 3.225GHz > > > > > Sapphire HD 5670 512MB Artic Cooling > > > > > MSI 770-C45 MoBo > > > > > Kingston 2GB RAM DDR3 1333 > > > > > 750GB Samsung SATA2 HDD > > > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > > -- > > > > 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS > > > > -- > > > Laptop: > > > Acer Aspire > > > Core Duo T2300E @ 1.67GHz > > > Intel GMA 950 IGP > > > Intel 945 Chipset > > > 1GB RAM (512MB*2) Dual Channel DDR2 > > > 80GB standard PATA HDD > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > > > hmmm : > > > Athlon II X4 630 OCd @ 3.225GHz > > > Sapphire HD 5670 512MB Artic Cooling > > > MSI 770-C45 MoBo > > > Kingston 2GB RAM DDR3 1333 > > > 750GB Samsung SATA2 HDD > > > Win7 Ultimate 32bit / Ubuntu 10.04 > > -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
