Its comparable to trying to add direct x support on a commador 64, sure you may pull it off but its useless cause the hardware behind it isn'tcapable of running anything that intenseive.
THEfog On 03/12/2010 5:33 PM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: Man, I do agree with you on those thoughts. But first we need full SM2 compliance. And I still say SM3 is next to worthless because there are no lightweight SM3 apps. SM3 is meant for a different hardware generation. On 3 Dez, 07:30, CHAMPION <[email protected]> wrote: > I Will Always Share My Part Of Exp With... -- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
