*nods* On 3 Dez, 08:23, "THEfog ." <[email protected]> wrote: > Its comparable to trying to add direct x support on a commador 64, sure you > may pull it off but its useless cause the hardware behind it isn'tcapable of > running anything that intenseive. > > THEfog > > On 03/12/2010 5:33 PM, "tribaljet" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Man, I do agree with you on those thoughts. But first we need full SM2 > compliance. And I still say SM3 is next to worthless because there are > no lightweight SM3 apps. SM3 is meant for a different hardware > generation. > > On 3 Dez, 07:30, CHAMPION <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I Will Always Share My Part Of Exp With... > >
-- 9xx SOLDIERS SANS FRONTIERS
