Hi all, Based on an extensive chat with Matthew, I think we reached some consensus. I'll write another RFC related to Annotations in docblocks, then we can chat until reach some standardization and availability.
I'll keep the old one for history purposes. It seems that none from core php devs accepted it, so I'll move it to rejected. As I told you previously, all I wanted was some good feedback to give a north and that's what I had. As soon as I finish the new RFC, I'll open another thread here for fine-grain the support and discuss architecture. I'll keep Stas comments in mind when creating it, so it would help in discussions. It seems we still have 2 weeks to discuss the new idea and less than 2 months to get it ready if everyone agreed. Regards, On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <i...@tyrael.hu> wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Lester Caine <les...@lsces.co.uk> wrote: > >> Christopher Jones wrote: >> >>> The editor argument is out of place do you really think that the >>>> engine should we built around what IDE supports? >>>> >>> >>> IDEs are part of the PHP ecosystem, just as much as frameworks, op >>> code caches, documentation, bug reports, maintenance issues and even >>> current technology trends. The benefits of a new feature must be >>> calculated taking into account its impact on the whole ecosystem. >>> >> >> And many of us do not recognise some of the 'complaints' simply because our >> own ecosystems have already solved the problem, but it's these 'new >> developments' that are threatening to destroy a perfectly stable system. >> >> > sorry my FUD counter just overflowed with your last comment. > > Tyrael > -- Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermebla...@hotmail.com São Paulo - SP/Brazil -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
