Stas, On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! > >> least hold ourselves to a level of mutual respect. Going out and >> calling someone a moron in public is not constructive nor respectful, >> and IMHO we as a project shouldn't sit back and blindly say "whatever" >> if it happens. > > OK, so what should we do instead? So far my calls to apply some TDD were > not heard, maybe this time? > > Let's consider an example of twitter user drupliconissad. It may be > genuine individual or a troll, it doesn't matter either way. > If you read the feed, you can find much more than "moron". Now, had we > had CoC, what would we do? We don't know who that is, so private > moderation is out of the question, even if we did - it's not look like a > personal conflict that can be amicably reconciled. Should we issue a > proclamation saying "we think some anonymous account on twitter is being > bad"? Should we ban that person (or group of persons - we have no idea > either way), which we have no idea who that is, from our list? Any other > ideas?
This particular case isn't what a CoC would protect. So I think that's a bit of a red herring. The CoC doesn't try to enforce itself outside of the scope of project members. Instead, it applies to project members wherever they represent the project. So unless we learn that the "drupliconissad" account actually was a internals contributor, it's beyond the scope of the CoC considering it also happened off-list. However, as Ferenc indicates, what Phil Sturgeon has been saying on twitter would be within the scope of the CoC, since he is a member of the project and is actively discussing the project and its members in a project-related context. Anthony -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
