On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:26 AM, Anthony Ferrara <ircmax...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The CoC doesn't try to enforce itself outside > of the scope of project members. Instead, it applies to project > members wherever they represent the project. > So just to be clear, your intent is for the CoC to apply *only* to those who actively participate in the project. Individuals who do not participate in the project would not be subject to the CoC *or* the mediation team, and complaints to the mediation team would be rejected as out of scope/jurisdiction? I think this is an important point to discuss, because it sets jurisdictional boundaries for the project, but also sets intent for what we're achieving here. I think this is also important because things have a tendency to expand. We need to have an answer if a conference organizer asks us to use our mediation team to resolve disputes at their conference. Or an open source project. Etc. I don't think we want to become the community's police force/judge/jury. This has been my chief concern all along: what to do about people who are NOT a part of the project. I think the RFC ought to make that explicit. Brandon
