On 10.01.2018 at 17:22, Rowan Collins wrote:

> On 10 January 2018 at 15:54, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On 10.01.2018 at 15:09, Rowan Collins wrote:
>>> I'll also echo a previous request that you apply for a wiki account to
>> make your document more readable; or maybe just put it as a github gist or
>> on your own website, and treat it as more of a wishlist and discussion
>> piece than a spec that core developers are going to commit to.
>> That is, however, not necessarily sufficient.  There are already several
>> accepted RFC with pending implementation[1], the oldest of which had
>> been accepted in 2011 and 2012, respectively.
> Sufficient for what? I was just saying it would be easier to read online in
> a versioned doc than in the bodies of a series of e-mails.

Sorry for badly quoting.  I fully agree that using another medium for
drafting the RFC other than this list would be preferable.  However, I
wanted to point out that it might not even make sense to do so, until
someone has been found who is willing and able :) to actually write a
suitable implementation.

Christoph M. Becker

PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

Reply via email to