>But that being said, I do support the proposal. I understand people
>opposed to removing features for no reason, but nobody needs this to
>be an operator, it's not a widely-used one, and we all know if it was
>proposed for addition today it would have 0 chance of acceptance.

How do you conclude that this is not a widely-used one? 

btw, you already hit the most important point. Why do we deprecate or remove 
feature for no good? 

> in case PHP decided in future to use backtick enclosed strings for Unicode 
> strings

AFAIK, since PHP7, we have no plan for unicode string. 

Best regards,
CHU Zhaowei

Reply via email to