Ram�n Jim�nez wrote: > There is a wrapping algorithm that attempts to reproduce the layout of the > edit view. This is to allow users to type code and retain the original > formatting to the extent that HTML allows. I strongly suggest killing it.
I can't think of one good reason to keep it. The way I see it, the formatting would be correct if there were no wrapping step on the output transformation. > Indeed, it seems to be the algorithm is entering an infinite loop with wish 15. > I will check it in due course Changing each linefeed to <br /> should suffice. There is no need to try to calculate any wraps. Wish 15 is formatted correctly already, as are my other wishes. This wrapping step puts in line breaks where I didn't have any and don't want any. It throws the formatting off. The simplest solution is to allow the author to control it. Also, someday, could you provide buttons to HTML-encode/decode the subject and description? Until then, there should be a reminder that these two are HTML fields, so "<", ">" and "&" should be used rather than characters "<", ">", and "&", resp.
