FYI, the IETF only makes ?two interoperable implementations? a requirement for full standard (?Internet Standard?). It is not a requirement for normal ?Proposed Standard? RFCs. See RFC 6410 for a longer discussion.
From: iotivity-dev-bounces at lists.iotivity.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gregg Reynolds Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 12:29 PM To: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira at intel.com> Cc: iotivity-dev at lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Requesting repository for constrained implementation On Aug 3, 2016 11:45 AM, "Thiago Macieira" <thiago.macieira at intel.com<mailto:thiago.macieira at intel.com>> wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 3 de agosto de 2016 05:18:54 PDT ?? wrote: > > Hi Thiago, ... We > need to interoperate with other implementations ... > Nothing says that we need to work on one implementation only. How > many, we get to decide. > I'd go further and say that Iotivity should follow the lead of IETF and make at least two distinct, interoperable, implementations a *requirement* for the project. Gregg -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.iotivity.org/pipermail/iotivity-dev/attachments/20160803/13133f95/attachment.html>
