Yeah I'm not clear about those reports either... but for example since my name doesn't appear at all and I can think of at least a few commits I've done, it's not showing everything.
Either way as I mentioned, the report is showing several folks who haven't contributed in years, so it's not the case that the active devs have stepped back recently... the report is a little misleading is all :) Thanks though I do appreciate the analysis! Nathan -----Original Message----- From: Mats Wichmann [mailto:m...@wichmann.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 5, 2018 12:44 PM To: Heldt-Sheller, Nathan <nathan.heldt-shel...@intel.com>; iotivity-dev@lists.iotivity.org Subject: Re: [dev] Inefficient code reviews On 09/05/2018 01:35 PM, Heldt-Sheller, Nathan wrote: > Thanks Mats. These graphs don't really show the primary contributors > recently, though, because those are often (mostly?) working on release > branches, not master! It's not as grim as it looks... most of the folks on > those graphs have been gone a long time, because work on master was > superceded by work on release branches years ago. > > That said, yes, we do have some areas that don't have clear > owners/maintainers. It's something that is a priority to sort out, and we > discussed it on today's OSWG call. I have the action item to follow up with > prior ISG (IoTivity Steering Group) members to try to improve. we merge release-branch commits to master fairly regularly, so they ought actually to show up in the reports. unless I'm completely misunderstanding how the report works (afiak it excludes merge commits themselves, but not the commits that were brought in by the merges). -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#9921): https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/message/9921 Mute This Topic: https://lists.iotivity.org/mt/25089084/21656 Group Owner: iotivity-dev+ow...@lists.iotivity.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.iotivity.org/g/iotivity-dev/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
