>But the people who understand QOS are in the transport area, and so far >they have ignored it. I would agree that the rsvp work folks did supports that. but I also think there are a lot of "implementation" issues and thats not there yet to my knowledge in the transport area. we would have to transport folks from here to the transport area for sure. Why not have them come to IPv6 WG to work on it instead? /jim -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------
- Revised IPng Working Group Charter Bob Hinden
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Marc Blanchet
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Chart... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group C... Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Gr... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Workin... Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Chart... Matt Crawford
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group C... Jim Bound
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Alex Conta
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Chart... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group C... Alex Conta
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Narsimharao Nagampalli
- Re: Revised IPng Working Group Charter Scott Bradner
