Jim, it's not just RSVP, there is also diffserv where I see a lot
of very practical implementation people. Wouldn't you rather
infect the TSV area with IPv6 than have them in a network area WG?
Brian
Jim Bound wrote:
>
> >But the people who understand QOS are in the transport area, and so far
> >they have ignored it.
>
> I would agree that the rsvp work folks did supports that. but I also
> think there are a lot of "implementation" issues and thats not there yet
> to my knowledge in the transport area. we would have to transport folks
> from here to the transport area for sure.
>
> Why not have them come to IPv6 WG to work on it instead?
>
> /jim
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
> IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
> FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
> Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
