Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 21:53:39 +0900
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| draft-itojun-ipv6-local-experiment-02.txt.
| 01 mentions 3ffe:501:ffff::/48 (officially reserved from WIDE pTLA
| space) and 02 removes it.
OK, yes, I did miss that (and 3 versions of it...) For reasons I
don't understand I keep falling off the ietf lists, and miss lots of
announcements...
Your draft is for a completely different purpose than Marc's. While
deleting the 3ffe:... addresses from it is better I think, it is far
less important that it be deleted from yours than it is from Marc's.
Yours needs what is realistically genuine address space, for it to work
as designed (there's no point discovering that your router won't route
illegal addresses - that's not very interesting information when your
point was to prove that things do work).
Marc's needs demonstrably "illegal" addresses, ones that cannot possibly
work - so they can be permanently recorded in manuals, etc, and never
cause any problems in the future. The requirements should be that the
address syntax is correct, and that the addresses are patently bogus.
kre
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
