At/� 15:59 2001-06-07 +0700, Robert Elz you wrote/vous �criviez:
...cut...
> | However, 3fffe:ff00::/24 has not been allocated to anyone.
>
>that one, and even the "prettier" 3ffe:0555 (or 3ffe:5550 or
>3ffe:5555 or something) from your later message are in the
>"could be allocated" category.
but anything outside of 2000::/3 has _no_ structure defined,
so choosing something outside of 2000::/3 is worst.
>We want a number that is trivially easy to recognise and filter, not
>a number (like the rfc1918 set -where there was little choice of course)
>that only "experts" can tell is not a valid number.
(but only "experts" will filter anyway, no?
Marc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
