At 09:25 AM 5/12/2001 -0400, Marc Blanchet wrote:
>- As Robert was saying about my draft, there is two issues:
> + do we agree on the idea of the draft?
> if yes, then find one address space which is the best one for that
> purpose. I don't care which one, I just proposed one. Any advice is
> appreciated. For the sake of generality, we might want to reserve a
> range that is similar to a TLA, so that anyone would be able to use it
> for examples involving TLAs.
> if no, then forget the draft.
>
>What is the opinion of the group?
I would like to say that I like Marc's idea a lot. It is like the 555 area
code in the movies.
It looks real, but everybody knows it's fake.
Carving address space from something already allocated to a customer,
as kre pointed out, is a bad idea. However, 3fffe:ff00::/24 has not been
allocated to anyone.
Thus, it looks ok to me.
The only one who can complain is Bob Fink, steward of the 6bone 3ffe::/16
prefix.
I'm going to use this in
draft-ietf-ngtrans-introduction-to-ipv6-transition-07.txt
every times I need to give an example of an IPv6 address.
- Alain.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
