there was suggestion to not use 3ffe::/16 space so that it can be later
(humm, do not know how many years...) reclaimed and reused as part of the
001b/3 current addressing architecture. So may be something out of
2000::/3 is the right thing, I don't know, and actually, I don't care. My
point was to reserve a space, any space, for documentation/examples/...
purposes.
Marc.
At/� 12:08 2001-06-06 -0700, Alain Durand you wrote/vous �criviez:
>At 11:50 AM 6/6/2001 -0700, Bill Manning wrote:
>
>> Strong Objections to this tactic. If you want a 6bone prefix,
>> you should follow the process. Hijacking is bad form. I'm
>> sure Bob would be amenable to making the delegation, but
>> asking is appropriate.
>
>This is the reason why I had Cced Bob to this thread.
>
>Bob:
>- do you think it would be appropriate to use a 6bone ptla for that purpose?
>- what should be the formal process to follow?
>- would you have any preferences? 3ffe:ff00::/24, 3ffe:5550::/28, anything
>else?
>
> - Alain.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
>IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
>FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
>Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPng Working Group Mailing List
IPng Home Page: http://playground.sun.com/ipng
FTP archive: ftp://playground.sun.com/pub/ipng
Direct all administrative requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
